The Blueprint — What the Muslim Brotherhood Wrote Down
What the Muslim Brotherhood wrote down, what it built, and where the pattern has appeared.
This brief summarizes the strategic doctrine and operational pattern of the Muslim Brotherhood movement as documented in two of its own internal planning documents and subsequent federal court proceedings.
The documents are not characterizations by outside observers. They are the Brotherhood's own words, recovered through law-enforcement investigations, authenticated through federal court, and now available to any citizen who wishes to read them.
The Documents§ 01
Two documents anchor what is known about the Brotherhood's institutional strategy in the West. Both were recovered by police authorities, neither was intended for public release, and both have been corroborated by subsequent academic and governmental research.
The Explanatory Memorandum (1991)
An eighteen-page internal Brotherhood planning document, dated 22 May 1991, authored by Mohamed Akram and addressed to the General Masul and Members of the Shura Council of the Brotherhood's North American branch. The document was recovered by the FBI in 2004 from the Falls Church, Virginia home of Ismail Elbarasse, a member of the Brotherhood's Shura Council. It was entered into United States federal court as Government Exhibit 003-0085 in United States v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, 3:04-CR-240-G (N.D. Tex. 2008) — described in a congressional bill finding as "the largest terror finance case in U.S. history." Memorandum, ISE-SW 1B10/0000413–0000427 [1] · ISGAP §3.2 [2] · H.R. 8236 [10]
The Project (1982)
A fourteen-page strategic plan titled Toward a Global Strategy for Islamic Policy, dated 1 December 1982. The document was seized in November 2001 by Swiss authorities from the Lugano villa of Youssef Nada, then a member of the Brotherhood's international leadership and the principal financier of Bank al-Taqwa, in raids following Nada's designation under U.S. Executive Order 13224 for terrorism financing. It was translated into French and published in 2005 in Sylvain Besson's La conquête de l'Occident; the English translation by Scott Burgess followed shortly thereafter. The Project, Bates 4100400027 et seq. [3] · ISGAP §3.1 [2]
The two documents predate one another by more than eight years and entered public view through unrelated investigations. Their shared vocabulary and institutional logic are best understood as evidence of a common Brotherhood strategic doctrine, whether through direct continuity, shared sources, or movement-wide planning vocabulary. The Memorandum operationalizes the Project's directives at the country level. ISGAP §3.4 [2]
Stated Objectives§ 02
The Memorandum opens by enumerating the Brotherhood's stated six-element strategic goal for North America, adopted by the organization's Shura Council and Organizational Conference in 1987. Quoted verbatim from the document's own English translation:
- Establishing an effective and stable Islamic Movement led by the Muslim Brotherhood.
- Adopting Muslims' causes domestically and globally.
- Expanding the observant Muslim base.
- Unifying and directing Muslims' efforts.
- Presenting Islam as a civilization alternative.
- Supporting the establishment of the global Islamic State wherever it is.
The Memorandum is explicit about the character of the work these objectives require. In the section titled Understanding the role of the Muslim Brother in North America, the document defines the work in the Brotherhood's own words:
"The Ikhwan must understand that their work in America is a kind of grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within and 'sabotaging' its miserable house by their hands and the hands of the believers so that it is eliminated and God's religion is made victorious over all other religions."
Government Exhibit 003-0085, ISE-SW 1B10/0000418, page 7 of 18 [1]
The Operational Process§ 03
The Brotherhood does not pursue its stated objectives through electoral or revolutionary contest. Both documents describe a deliberate, sequenced, multi-decade process the Brotherhood terms tamkeen — institutional entrenchment. The process moves from doctrine through institution-building to influence over public discourse, with each stage providing the cover and infrastructure for the next. ISGAP §2.1–2.3 [2]
Tamkeen is not a tactic of survival. The Brotherhood's own documents describe it as a multi-generational project of transformation in which Islamist movements position themselves to shape the institutional environment around them until they are sufficiently entrenched to advance their wider objectives. ISGAP §1.4 [2] Each stage of the process provides the cover and the infrastructure for the next; the institutional network built in Stage 3 supplies the personnel for Stage 4 narrative work, which in turn produces the activation capacity demonstrated in Stage 5.
The Four Operational Domains — United States§ 04
ISGAP's November 2025 analysis identifies four operational domains in which the Brotherhood's North American network has implemented the Memorandum's directives. Each domain corresponds to specific institutional categories the Memorandum enumerates in its list of "Comprehensive Settlement Organizations." Memorandum, ISE-SW 1B10/0000426 [1] · ISGAP Ch. 4 [2]
Executive-branch positioning
Brotherhood-connected individuals have been placed in federal advisory and ambassadorial roles across multiple administrations, including positions at the Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Commission on International Religious Freedom, and as Ambassador-at-Large for International Religious Freedom. In 2012, a coalition of 57 Muslim organizations successfully pressured the FBI to purge counterterrorism training materials. ISGAP §4.1 [2]
Lawfare and parallel jurisprudence
CAIR has pursued SLAPP-style litigation against reformist Muslim critics. Muslim Advocates secured the 2012 removal of "jihad," "Islamist," and "Islamic terrorism" from FBI training materials. A parallel Islamic financial system operates with major-institution liquidity, including Guidance Residential, which exceeded $1B in Freddie Mac liquidity by 2007. ISGAP §4.2 [2]
Network expansion
U.S. mosques grew from 1,209 in 2000 to 2,769 by 2020; the North American Islamic Trust holds title to more than 300 Islamic centers in 42 states; CAIR expanded from 8 chapters in 2001 to 33 by 2007. The institutional network includes 498 full-time Islamic schools, an accreditation body (CISNA, founded 1989), and a youth pipeline running from MSA to MYNA to SJP. ISGAP §4.3, §5.1.3.3 [2]
Discourse and academia
Al Jazeera and its U.S. operations have resisted FARA registration; the 2017 Saudi-UAE-Bahrain-Egypt blockade of Qatar specifically demanded Al Jazeera's closure. UC Berkeley's Islamophobia Research and Documentation Project was founded by Hatem Bazian, also a co-founder of American Muslims for Palestine, with operational ties to organizations from the Holy Land Foundation–era network. ISGAP §4.4 [2]
Where the Pattern Has Appeared — Europe§ 05
ISGAP focuses on the United States but identifies a comparable Brotherhood operation in Europe, anchored in the Federation of Islamic Organizations in Europe (FIOE), the European Council for Fatwa and Research (chaired for decades by Yusuf al-Qaradawi), and a network of national affiliates. ISGAP §2.2.3 [2] Two recent governmental reports — one in the United Kingdom, one in France — independently corroborate the strategic pattern the Memorandum describes.
United Kingdom
The 2014 UK government review of the Muslim Brotherhood, commissioned by Prime Minister David Cameron and led by Sir John Jenkins (then UK Ambassador to Saudi Arabia) and Sir Charles Farr (then Director General of the Home Office's Office for Security and Counter Terrorism), concluded that "membership of, association with, or influence by the Muslim Brotherhood should be considered as a possible indicator of extremism." The review identified the Palestine Return Centre, founded in London in 1986, as Brotherhood-associated. Muslim Brotherhood Review: Main Findings, HC 679 [4] · ISGAP §5.2.1 [2]
The Memorandum's institutional template — community organizations, schools, advocacy networks, interfaith positioning, identity capture — was implemented in the UK through the Muslim Council of Britain and a network of affiliated bodies, several of which the Jenkins review identified by name in its full classified report. [4][5]
France
In May 2025, French Minister of the Interior Bruno Retailleau presented a 73-page Ministry of Interior report, authored by senior diplomats François Gouyette and Pascal Courtade, titled Frères musulmans et islamisme politique en France. The report identifies 280 associations in France linked to the Muslim Brotherhood and describes the movement's strategy of "entryism" — covert institutional infiltration of public schools, municipal governments, and civil-society organizations — as a "threat to national cohesion." [6][7]
The Ministry of Interior report identifies four operational domains in France that mirror the four ISGAP identifies in the United States: religious infrastructure, education (21 Brotherhood-aligned schools enrolling 4,200 students), digital media, and local community structures. A parallel French parliamentary report released in December 2025 describes Islamist movements deploying a "three-part strategy of dissimulation, double-discourse, and victimization" to infiltrate political and social infrastructure, producing what the parliamentary report terms "separatist ecosystems" in cities including Lyon, Marseille, and across Northern France. [6][8]
The British and French reports were commissioned independently of one another, used different methodologies, drew on different intelligence sources, and reached convergent conclusions about the same movement operating to the same strategic template the 1991 Memorandum describes. The Brotherhood's North American program is one country's implementation of a transnational strategy that has produced the same institutional architecture, the same lever (the strategic deployment of "Islamophobia" as a discourse-ending accusation), and the same downstream effect (the marginalization of reformist Muslim voices and the capture of community representation) on three continents. [2][4][6]
Calibration§ 06
The strength of this material rests on what it claims and what it does not.
It does not claim that the Muslim Brotherhood is the explanation for all antisemitism in the United States or Europe. Antisemitism on the political right exists with separate sources. Antisemitism in academic frameworks — Soviet-era anti-Zionism, certain postcolonial currents — has its own history. Antisemitism in some other political subcultures predates and operates outside Brotherhood institutional networks. The Brotherhood is one major vector — the most institutionally sophisticated, the most extensively documented in federal court proceedings, and the vector whose infrastructure most directly explains the post–October 7 coordinated mobilization.
It does not characterize all Muslim Americans, all Muslim institutions, or all Muslim civic activity as Brotherhood-aligned. The Brotherhood's own documents describe its strategy as displacing alternative Muslim voices and capturing community representation. Reformist Muslims who have publicly opposed Brotherhood ideology — Zuhdi Jasser, Asra Nomani, Irshad Manji — have faced sustained campaigns of professional and personal cost. The cost of Brotherhood institutional capture falls first on the Muslims it claims to represent. ISGAP §4.4.4 [2]
It does not characterize individuals not named in the source documents. The named organizations in the Memorandum's Attachment 1 are identified by the Brotherhood itself as "our organizations and the organizations of our friends." That is the Brotherhood's characterization, recorded in a 1991 internal document later entered into federal court. Memorandum, ISE-SW 1B10/0000427 [1]
Source Documents
- An Explanatory Memorandum on the General Strategic Goal for the Group in North America (1991), Government Exhibit 003-0085, U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development, 3:04-CR-240-G (N.D. Tex. 2008). Available: investigativeproject.org/documents/20
- Institute for the Study of Global Antisemitism and Policy (ISGAP), The Muslim Brotherhood's Strategic Entryism into the United States: A Systemic Analysis, November 2025. ISBN 978-1-940186-32-0. Available: isgap.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/MB-Project-Final-251117-01.pdf
- The Muslim Brotherhood Project: Toward a Worldwide Strategy for Islamic Policy (1982), seized Lugano, Switzerland, November 2001. Translated by Scott Burgess. Available: investigativeproject.org/documents/misc/687.pdf
- Muslim Brotherhood Review: Main Findings, HM Government, presented to Parliament 17 December 2015, HC 679. Available: gov.uk/government/publications
- Sir John Jenkins, Islamism and the Left (Policy Exchange, 2021). Available: policyexchange.org.uk
- François Gouyette and Pascal Courtade, Frères musulmans et islamisme politique en France, Ministère de l'Intérieur (France), presented 21 May 2025. Coverage: France 24, 21 May 2025
- Lorenzo Vidino, The Closed Circle: Joining and Leaving the Muslim Brotherhood in the West (Columbia University Press, 2020).
- Commission d'enquête sur les ingérences étrangères, Rapport (Xavier Breton, président; Matthieu Bloch, rapporteur), Assemblée nationale, December 2025.
- U.S. v. Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development et al., 3:04-CR-240-G (N.D. Tex. 2008). Memorandum Opinion Order on unindicted co-conspirator status, 2009. Available: investigativeproject.org/case/65
- H.R. 8236, 119th Cong., Designating Hamas Affiliates in America Act of 2026, finding describing the Holy Land Foundation trial as "the largest terror finance case in U.S. history." Available: govinfo.gov/content/pkg/BILLS-119hr8236ih